Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 10:29

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
500-Million-Year-Old Mystery Fossil Rewrites Early Animal Evolution - SciTechDaily
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
One Molecule to Sleep and Wake: A New Brain Switch Discovered - Neuroscience News
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Marvell Stock Slides. Why It Could Be the Cheap AI Chip Play. - Barron's
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Why do men love boobs (irrespective of big or small)?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
World-First: Scientists Capture a Rare Lightning-Triggered Gamma-Ray Burst - SciTechDaily